COMBATIVES BRAZIL · SP
REAL-WORLD
COMBATIVES
UNDERSTAND VIOLENCE.
PREPARE TO RESPOND.

AWARENESS PREVENTION PROTECTION DEFENSE

COMBATIVES

By Rodrigo Braddock, 23 July, 2026
COMBATIVES — Knowledge Before Confrontation.

COMBATIVES · SÃO PAULO · BRAZIL 

Understanding conflict before teaching confrontation.

 

Combatives is an independent project dedicated to the study of violence, human behavior, protection and decision making under uncertainty.

Its field of interest begins before physical contact.

Prevention, perception, communication, environment, vulnerability, behavior and decision making are studied alongside martial practice, historical conflicts and documented real world incidents.

The objective is not to reduce violence to a fighting problem. It is to understand the larger process in which confrontation may become only one possible outcome.

Principle

The physical confrontation is often only the visible part of a much larger problem.

FIELD OF STUDY 

Human conflict cannot be understood through technique alone.

Combatives examines different dimensions of conflict instead of treating every problem as a physical encounter.

The subjects often overlap. That overlap is precisely where many important questions appear.

01

Violence & Society

Urban violence, domestic violence, vulnerable populations, victimization, prevention and the social environments in which violence develops.

02

Human Behavior

Perception, fear, coercion, escalation, communication, decision making and behavior under pressure.

03

Real Incidents

Documented cases studied through context, sequence, warning signs, constraints, decisions and consequences.

04

History of Conflict

War, resistance, intelligence, leadership, logistics, adaptation, terrain, uncertainty and human error.

05

Martial History

Martial systems studied within their historical environments, original purposes, transformations and cultural context.

06

Protection & Decision

Risk recognition, communication, avoidance, mobility, protection of vulnerable people and decisions under uncertainty.

HISTORY AS EVIDENCE 

Conflict has been documenting human behavior for centuries.

Military history, resistance movements, intelligence operations, martial traditions, expeditions, crises and urban conflicts provide records of people making decisions with incomplete information and real consequences.

We study these events without attempting to turn historical warfare into simplistic lessons for modern self defense.

Instead, history allows us to examine recurring questions involving perception, surprise, preparation, adaptation, leadership, error, environment and uncertainty.

History is not decoration.
It is a record of decisions and consequences.

REAL INCIDENTS 

Study what actually happened.

Real incidents provide information that training rooms, demonstrations and hypothetical scenarios cannot produce by themselves.

Documented cases are examined to understand how an event developed, what preceded it, what constraints were present, where decisions occurred and what consequences followed.

The purpose is not to judge victims with the advantage of hindsight. It is to understand the event more accurately.

01 What happened?
02 What happened before the visible confrontation?
03 What constraints and decision points existed?
04 What can and cannot reasonably be concluded?

PROTECTION 

Fighting is not the starting point.

Protection may involve perception, communication, environmental awareness, movement, seeking assistance, protecting another person, leaving an area or preventing a situation from escalating.

In some circumstances physical action may become necessary. In others, physical confrontation may increase the risk.

The relevant question is not simply whether a technique exists. It is whether a decision is appropriate for the person, environment, threat and consequences involved.

Protection is larger than fighting.

SCOPE 

We study the problem from more than one direction.

Combatives does not attempt to replace specialized professional disciplines.

Instead, it connects questions that frequently meet in real incidents but are often studied separately.

01

Violence, prevention and public safety.

02

Human behavior, perception and decision making.

03

History, strategy and documented conflict.

04

Martial traditions, combat sports and physical practice.

05

Children, families, older people and vulnerable populations.

06

Real incidents, professional experience and testimony.

SOURCES & FURTHER STUDY 

The study should continue beyond Combatives.

Articles and studies are developed through research, documented cases and relevant specialist material.

Whenever appropriate, individual publications provide references that allow readers to examine sources and continue the subject independently.

Academic research

Scientific and specialist literature relevant to each subject.

International and public institutions

Official data, reports, archives and specialist organizations.

Historical archives

Primary documents, institutional collections and historical scholarship.

Documentaries and testimony

Recorded experiences from witnesses, victims, professionals and specialists when relevant to the subject.

Books, lectures and interviews

Additional material selected according to the subject under study.

COMBATIVES 

Knowledge before confrontation.

Violence is complex. No article, training session, historical example or individual discipline can remove that complexity.

Our purpose is to study it seriously enough to improve understanding, awareness and the quality of the questions being asked.

Study the context.
Question assumptions.
Understand the limits.
Keep learning.

REALITY AND PROTECTION 

VIOLENCE IS NOT ONLY PHYSICAL

Violence may involve coercion, control, neglect, exploitation, stalking, psychological abuse or sexual violence before, alongside or without a physical attack. Protection starts with understanding what is actually happening.

CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS 

Missing does not automatically mean abducted

A missing-person record can involve different circumstances, including voluntary absence, family conflict, loss of contact and criminal situations. The distinction matters. What also matters is rapid reporting, information sharing and understanding the circumstances surrounding the disappearance.

WOMEN 

Physical violence may be only one part of the problem

Intimate partner violence can involve coercive control, stalking, threats, psychological aggression, sexual violence, financial restriction and physical assault. Looking only for injuries can mean looking at the problem too late.

OLDER PEOPLE 

Access and dependence can create vulnerability

Neglect, abandonment, financial exploitation, psychological abuse, medication control and physical violence may involve relatives, caregivers or other people with regular access to the victim, their home, finances or daily routine.

SEXUAL VIOLENCE 

Familiar does not automatically mean safe

Sexual violence cannot be understood only through stranger-danger scenarios. Prevention also requires attention to access, trust, dependency, vulnerability, boundaries and relationships in which the offender may already be known to the victim.

19,573

children ages 0–11 and adolescents ages 12–17 recorded as missing in Brazil in 2025

155,111

reports of violence against women registered through Ligue 180 in Brazil in 2025

84,388

rape records reported by public security authorities in Brazil in 2025

22.54%

of Disque 100 human-rights complaints in 2025 involved violence against older people

Sources: Brazilian Ministry of Justice and Public Security / Senasp, Annual Statistical Report on Missing and Located Persons 2024–2025; Brazilian Ministry of Women, Ligue 180 data for 2025; Brazilian Public Security Forum, Brazilian Public Security Yearbook 2026; and Ministry of Human Rights and Citizenship / National Human Rights Ombudsman, 2025 Management Report. Indicators represent different databases, methodologies and units and must not be added together. Missing-person records are not equivalent to abductions. Reports and complaints are records received by public systems and are not, by themselves, judicially confirmed cases.